companydirectorylist.com  글로벌 비즈니스 디렉토리 및 회사 디렉토리
검색 비즈니스 , 회사 , 산업 :


국가 목록
미국 회사 디렉토리
캐나다 기업 목록
호주 비즈니스 디렉토리
프랑스 회사 목록
이탈리아 회사 목록
스페인 기업 디렉토리
스위스 기업 목록
오스트리아 회사 디렉토리
벨기에 비즈니스 디렉토리
홍콩 기업 목록
중국 사업 목록
대만 기업 목록
아랍 에미레이트 회사 디렉토리


산업 카탈로그
미국 산업 디렉토리














  • How do I square a logarithm? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    $\log_2 (3) \approx 1 58496$ as you can easily verify $ (\log_2 (3))^2 \approx (1 58496)^2 \approx 2 51211$ $2 \log_2 (3) \approx 2 \cdot 1 58496 \approx 3 16992$ $2^ {\log_2 (3)} = 3$ Do any of those appear to be equal? (Whenever you are wondering whether some general algebraic relationship holds, it's a good idea to first try some simple numerical examples to see if it is even possible
  • Why cant you square both sides of an equation?
    That's because the $9$ on the right hand side could have come from squaring a $3$ or from squaring a $-3$ So, when you square both sides of an equation, you can get extraneous answers because you are losing the negative sign That is, you don't know which one of the two square roots of the right hand side was there before you squared it
  • Why can I square both sides? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    we can square both side like this: $ x^2= 2$ But I don't understand why that it's okay to square both sides What I learned is that adding, subtracting, multiplying, or dividing both sides by the same thing is okay For example: $ x = 1 $ $ x-1 = 1-1 $ $ x-1 = 0 $ $ x \times 2 = 1 \times 2 $ $ 2x = 2 $ like this But how come squaring both
  • Inequality proof, why isnt squaring by both sides permissible?
    7 Short answer: We can't simply square both sides because that's exactly what we're trying to prove: $$0 < a < b \implies a^2 < b^2$$ More somewhat related details: I think it may be a common misconception that simply squaring both sides of an inequality is ok because we can do it indiscriminately with equalities
  • algebra precalculus - How to square both the sides of an equation . . .
    I understand that you can't really square on both the sides like I did in the first step, however, if this is not the way to do it, then how can you really solve an equation like this one (in which there's a square root on the LHS) without substitution?
  • What is the difference between meters squared and square meters?
    This is certainly true about 'metre square' You might however think there is a different meaning to 'metre squared' and 'metre square', as perhaps Paul does I was explicitly taught the difference in a British school in the 1970s, and it was the order of the words that was emphasised
  • Isnt square root a bit like Log()? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    I took a look at square root Squaring the number means x^2 And if I understood the square root correctly it does a bit inverse of squaring a number and gets back the x I had a friend tell me a while ago that Log() is also opposite of exponent, wouldn't that mean that square root is like a variant of Log () that only inverse a squared number?
  • How do you find the closest square number to another number without . . .
    Say we try to find the closest square number to 26 we already know the closest square number is $25$ However, how do I calculate out 25? Because, if I try to prime factorize it like so: $\\s




비즈니스 디렉토리, 기업 디렉토리
비즈니스 디렉토리, 기업 디렉토리 copyright ©2005-2012 
disclaimer